hey, to much study gets me into this, so lets see. there are a couple of questions which are said to have no answer, well i say that if we are dumb and imaginative enough, we can handle them. So make some, and we will try to answer, as a sample: S1: Some1 once said that if god is omniscient (knows everything) he cant be omnipotent (can do anything). lets see, if he has the power to build the tallest building ever, then he cant know how to build one higher. So he can either build and not to know, or he knows but cant build because he allways knows something taller. Well the idiot answer is: that guy was wrong! One being (god or w/e) being omnipotent can also be omniscient or vice-versa. why? the answer is by building something that can allways grow. So at any given time he knows how to build something bigger, but his first "gadget" can still surpass anything he might come of after. So he is allways right. S2: who came first? the egg or the chicken? this one is simple: it depends. if you believe that god made the world, then the chicken came first, because god made the animals, not how they reproduce. But if you believe that somehow life evolved from an explosion then the answer is simple, the egg came first. If things evolve, then they start something, and slowly change. well then at some point, that something became closer to a chicken, and placed an egg. since the egg is the first step to a chicken to be born, the egg is allways first, because the previous thing was not a chicken according to the conventional idea that chickens come from eggs, and reproduce "via" eggs. when these change, it becomes something else and not a chicken . S3: when does a man start being bald? when he has no hair in the head? but if he has 1 hair string (or a few more like homer simpson), isnt he bald? so is it possible to exactly know when 1 starts being bald or not? (this is a very well-known paradox pointed out by the Sorites, although formulated in a diferent way.) Supposedly, theres no answer because its impossible to get a concept where after one more/less hair string one becames bald or not (thats why it is a paradox). the answer however can be another, the fact we dont know one barrier between that, doesnt mean theres isnt one. the problem comes from what you consider the term bald meaning. so if being bald is having from few to none, then create a range where a guy is defenetly bald by your concept, and a range where he surely isnt. now in the gap between those 2 groups one can be or cannot be bald. you can either call them shit/stupids/the middle/pussy/dicks/anything, so you go from bald to shit and from shit to not bald, then now you can decide exactly when 1 guy is bald or not , by the 1 hair string diference you want, couldnt be any better! there are other type of answers, i like this one the most ^^. ok, so now give your best shot and get your answer xD.